Playboy Launching Goes On Amid Protests in Indonesia
Indonesia’s PT Velvet Silver Media has said yes to the launching of a local version of Playboy magazine in March amid protests from conservative Muslim groups and national politicians. The magazine however would not publish nude pictures due to cultural reasons. It would instead cover Indonesian celebrities and experts on many fields.

Jodi Ann Paterson and Tiara Lestari
Ponti Carolus, the director said on a news conference, “Our concept is lifestyle and world class journalism. Our articles will have high quality, including conventional issues.” Women would certainly not be treated as an object. For an instance, he added, British band Rolling Stones was also on the cover of Japanese Playboy. Furthermore, the distribution of the magazine will be controlled because it will only be available by subscription and at selected retailers. The name Playboy is in all probability merely an affair of convenience to reach more sources.
But conservative Muslim group Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia is not buying it. “Different or not, Playboy is Playboy. It is a porn magazine. Those are the words of the businessmen. The magazine will damage the morality of the nation,” chairman Irfan Awas said.
The disapproval is also backed by The Indonesian Ulemas Council (MUI), the country’s top authority on Islamic affairs. Maruf Amin, head of MUI’s fatwa commission, says, “The government should forbid this kind of media, as it will cause a strong reaction from people and tend to bring anarchy among the people who are against this magazine.”
The Indonesian Press Council, on the other hand, says it has no right whatsoever to ban the magazine as it is part of legally registered franchise—despite some members’ personal objection. Chairman Ichlasul Amal commented that it was a premature step to criticize the Indonesian Playboy prior to its publication. No magazine can be banned in Indonesia’s new era of democracy due to the government’s declining intervention in the press.
Surprisingly enough, some Indonesian women have done a spread or two for Playboy in other countries. Borneo-born Jodi Ann Paterson is perhaps the most popular after being named Playmate of The Year 2000. Other names including Petra Verkaik—Miss December 1989 and model Tiara Lestari.
Indeed, pornography is against the law in Indonesia; where most people practice moderate Islam with no restriction on whether or not women must wear veil. Nevertheless it is not difficult to find pirated pornographic DVDs in public places. Hardliners have yet to do anything about these; which makes it rather odd that all of sudden they are united to speak against something that is still uncertain. Business lasts so long as there is demand, does it not? Erotic magazines—as well as other form of pornography—are no exception. It is a little out of place to say that a single magazine could utterly ruin a nation’s morality—regardless of the content. So, why bother?
Related Articles:
And the Playboy Saga Continues
Indonesia Against Porn
Playboy Indonesia, Eh?




Greetings once more my Utopian seeking friend.
I enjoyed this particular piece on erotic material and public uproar. Personally I don’t see how a single magazine can “corrupt” a society. Though by definition, if the vast majority within that society choose to ban pornography then it is in their right.
But a truly democratic society can never make such a choice for it endangers the very principles it says it shall uhold, that of freedom of expression.
My main concern has always been the mixing of the church (Religion) with that of the State (Politics) which causes more harm than good. Granted certain material should be kept in an appropriate place, such as an adult bookstore or adult venue where by law only adults should enter with no need to fear reprisals or moral judgement.
I believe everyone deserves a right to practice any religion freely and or any political thought that do not cross certain universal laws (i.e. killing, racism or degradation of social classes). In other words, if a man or woman chooses to read or purchase a playboy or any other adult magazine in his/her own privacy that person should be free of a social backlash as long as his/ her preferences don’t interfere with someone’s else’s personal space.
Sex or the showing of nudity should not be considered some sin. it should be embraced and taught to be handled with a certain respect because we all as individuals have different and often conflicting views but those views no matter how different should be heard and respected not banned or burned or even labeled as corrupt.
Sex/ nudity is not what is corrupting societies around the world. The true corruption of any society begins in the home, when a sense of unlove is instilled, when fear rises, when humiliation occurs when greed becomes a need that evil can plant its seed and thus corruption seeps in from family to church to state.
So i end this little informative rant on the note of: my fellow readers do not judge a magazine or its content as obscene just because it doesnt fit into your particular worldview but look at all aspects of your life and see where the true corruption of society may begin, it is not in the pages of a magazine but true corruption can only begin and end in the hearts of men and women.
Thank you.
Comment by José — January 24, 2006 @ 5:15 pm
Interesting point of view
Nevertheless, José, nudity is indeed a sin in Indonesia–regardless the religion. I don’t call myself religious but I am aware of the fact. However, I also understand–as I have stated on the piece–that it is simply silly to ask the government to ban the magazine. It is a democratic country. As you said, “the true corruption of society begins in the home”.
My attitude is, if I don’t like it, then I won’t buy it. It’s that easy. What concerns me more is that these people still have the time to protest against such a useless thing; while there are more urgent things need to be solved. The tsunami victims, earthquake, inflation, national debt, corruption…Compared to them, this Playboy controversy is a trivial matter. I wonder when will they realize?
Comment by ayulittleone — January 24, 2006 @ 6:54 pm
“Don’t like it, Don’t buy it”
Wonderfully put. I agree. Now in terms of it being a trivial matter, it really is very trivial when compared to national debt, disaster relief, poverty and crime. same thing happens in my own homeland, trivial matters tend to take up headlines while issues of great public concern take a backburner.
Society can be easily swayed to forget the real issues, the real concerns.
Comment by José — January 24, 2006 @ 7:55 pm
Interesting topic. It reminds me a lot of what Larry Flynt — publisher of Hustler magazine — went through here in the United States back in the 70s and 80s. I recommend Milos Foreman’s “The People vs. Larry Flynt” to anyone interested in freedom of the press/artistic expression issues such as this.
Flynt was shot and paralyzed by an opponent of his magazine. Do you think such an issue could come to violence in Indonesia, as well?
Comment by Aaron — January 24, 2006 @ 8:01 pm
Violence is another thing. People there wouldn’t react that far–I hope. I think those conservative groups are the only ones who blow things out of proportion; but these people have the access to the media and all. I’m sure the ragpickers, bus drivers, maids (they do have alot there) care more about what would they eat tomorrow instead of this.
Comment by ayulittleone — January 24, 2006 @ 8:19 pm
To me it’s how she represents herself as a muslim woman…she does come from a country believe to have 90% or more muslims.It could also be that if nobody says anything, then there could be worse calamities, perhaps. I know this is such a lame opinion for many (I just based it from the Quran)but sometimes little things like that does matter. Though I agree with you on that there are other things that needed more attention..still it’s always good to begin somewhere…
just my two cents…
Comment by Apples — January 25, 2006 @ 4:18 pm
Not lame at all, Apples. Judging from Quran, I 100% agree with you. I myself has to confess my sin for not wearing veil. Yet Indonesia doesn’t apply Islamic law, so the state cannot interfere with such things. And what is worth noted is that there have been several male magazines like FHM–if I’m not mistaken, I don’t read male mags :p. I think Playboy Indonesia would adapt the same style. Uh what am I talking about? I don’t support Playboy in anyway, just to let you know. I just hope things won’t go too far with the protests like the last time when Artika Sari Devi joined Miss Universe.
Comment by ayulittleone — January 25, 2006 @ 4:40 pm
Yeah I understand. That FHM in Singapore sells like hot cakes! I would think there’s more freedom of speech in Indonesia now so I suppose they’re taking advantage of that. For me I’m just worried about the next generation too. Last thing you want to know is to find out that a 10-year old is having sex next door..which has already happened here….very sad…
Comment by Apples — January 28, 2006 @ 12:22 am
I know what you mean, Apples. I hear often youngsters here said things like, “I love the baby but I hate her/his mother!” Geez…
Comment by ayulittleone — January 30, 2006 @ 12:00 pm
thanks it was great
Comment by gerry e methvin — January 20, 2008 @ 12:19 am